Tailored Rotor-Blade Ice-Protection System

ABSTRACT

An ice protection system is configured for a rotor blade having a leading edge along at least a portion of a spanwise length extending between a root portion and a tip portion. The system has an electric spanwise anti-ice heater configured for placement on the leading edge of the blade and a first electric spanwise de-ice heater adjacent the anti-ice heater and having varying chordwise dimensions. The de-ice heater is configured for placement on an upper surface of the blade or a lower surface of the blade. Electrical connectors for each heater are configured for connection near the root portion of the blade to a source of electrical power.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 15/694,666, filed on 1 Sep. 2017 and titled “TAILOREDROTOR-BLADE ICE-PROTECTION SYSTEM,” the entire content of which ishereby expressly incorporated by reference.

BACKGROUND

An ice-protection system (IPS) for an aircraft is used to prevent thebuildup of ice on surfaces that require proper airflow across thesurface to create lift, such as the wings of fixed-wing aircraft androtors of rotary-wing aircraft, including both helicopters andtiltrotors. These systems can include one or both of anti-icecomponents, which are intended to prevent ice formation, and de-icecomponents, which cause shedding of ice that has already formed. An IPSmay have mechanical components, such as inflatable bladders, and/orelectrical components, such as heaters.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is an oblique view of a tiltrotor aircraft having a rotor-bladeIPS according to this disclosure.

FIG. 2 is an oblique view of a heater blanket of a prior art IPS.

FIG. 3 is a 2-D view of the components of the prior-art heater blanketof FIG. 2.

FIG. 4 is a 2-D view of detail of the heater blanket of FIG. 2.

FIG. 5 is an exploded view of a rotor blade configured for use with theaircraft of FIG. 1 and comprising a heater blanket according to thisdisclosure.

FIG. 6 is a 2-D view of the components of the heater blanket of FIG. 5.

FIGS. 7A through 7C are simplified 2-D views of detail of embodiments ofthe heater blanket of FIG. 5.

FIG. 8 is a 2-D view of the components of another embodiment of theheater blanket of FIG. 5.

FIG. 9 is a 2-D view of the components of another embodiment of theheater blanket of FIG. 5.

FIG. 10 is a 2-D view of the components of another embodiment of theheater blanket of FIG. 5.

FIG. 11 is a 2-D view of the components of another embodiment of theheater blanket of FIG. 5.

FIG. 12 is a 2-D view of the components of another embodiment of theheater blanket of FIG. 5.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In this disclosure, reference may be made to the spatial relationshipsbetween various components and to the spatial orientation of variousaspects of components as the devices are depicted in the attacheddrawings. However, as will be recognized by those skilled in the artafter a complete reading of this disclosure, the devices, members,apparatuses, etc. described herein may be positioned in any desiredorientation. Thus, the use of terms such as “above,” “below,” “upper,”“lower,” or other like terms to describe a spatial relationship betweenvarious components or to describe the spatial orientation of aspects ofsuch components should be understood to describe a relative relationshipbetween the components or a spatial orientation of aspects of suchcomponents, respectively, as the device described herein may be orientedin any desired direction.

This disclosure divulges a rotor-blade ice-protection system (IPS)comprising components tailored to match the pattern of ice formation ona particular rotor blade design. For example, the IPS is tailored basedon airfoil shape, twist profile, tip speed, and airflow.

Several factors affect ice accretion on a rotor blade, but a couple ofthe major contributors include velocity and blade shape. A tailored IPSis one that is not bound by the simple heating zone shapes used for easein manufacturing of legacy technologies. This new design uses acombination of de-ice and anti-ice heating areas that is optimal forremoval and prevention of ice formation based on the unique rotor bladegeometric features as well as the performance-critical portions of theblade.

The outboard portion of a rotor blade contributes to performance greaterthan the inboard portion and also experiences greater rotationalvelocity, and one embodiment of a tailored IPS includes an anti-ice zonethat tapers wider as it extends toward the blade tip. This would preventthe formation of ice at the outboard end of the blade and preserve themost critical area related to blade performance. A larger anti-ice zonethat covers more area than legacy configurations may not require morepower than existing solutions due to the anti-ice requiring constant lowpower versus de-ice zones requiring cycling of high powerintermittently.

Another embodiment of a tailored IPS has heated zone configurations thatare designed as spanwise-extending zones (extending down the length ofthe blade) that experience the benefits related to chordwise-zoneconfigurations (across the width of the blade). In this design, thespanwise zones are used to reduce the number of potential failuresrelated to electrical connections and electrical bus routing throughhigh-strain areas of the blade. The few connections that are requiredare all located at the inboard end “root” of the blade with short bussesor electrical leads. Through specific geometry and varying resistance,these spanwise zones are designed to act like chordwise zones byalternating heating areas along the span of the blade. This reduces thesize of the ice chunk that is shed off of the blade, which is especiallycritical for the blades of a tiltrotor aircraft that can shed ice towardthe fuselage in certain flight conditions.

In addition, the IPS of this disclosure can be more robust and reliablewith optional redundancies, such as multiple layers of thin, conductivezones and multiple electrical connections per zone. With multipleconnections per zone for redundancy, a failure monitoring system can beused to switch between connections in the case of a failure whilemaintaining nominal system properties.

Prior methods of rotor-blade ice protection on helicopters have includeda configuration of several adjacent electrically heated zones that runin the spanwise direction along the full length of the blade, and poweris applied to these zones by electrical connections at the root end ofthe blade. Helicopter rotor blades are directly above the aircraft, sothe high centrifugal force on the blades sheds ice far clear of theaircraft. However, this spanwise zone configuration has been avoided fortiltrotor aircraft due to the concern with shedding large chunks of icetoward the fuselage during de-ice operation while in airplane mode. Inthe unique airplane mode of flight for a tiltrotor, the tip path planeof the rotor blades is located out to the sides of and perpendicular tothe fuselage. For tiltrotor aircraft, spanwise heating zones would bepreferred if there were a way to minimize the size of the ice that isshed from the blades.

FIG. 1 illustrates a Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey tiltrotor aircraft 11,comprising fuselage 13 and a transverse wing 15. A nacelle 17 is locatedat each end of wing 15 and is capable of rotation between a horizontalorientation, as shown, for wing-borne flight in airplane mode and avertical orientation for rotor-borne flight in helicopter mode. Eachnacelle houses an engine for providing torque to an attached rotor 19,each rotor having a plurality of blades 21. To prevent ice formation andto shed ice formed on blades 21, an IPS (described below) is installedon a leading edge 23 of each blade 21 and extends rearward from theleading edge.

A prior-art IPS on tiltrotor aircraft like aircraft 11 has electricallyheated zones that run in the chordwise direction around the leading edgeof the blade. Multiple chordwise zones are located adjacent to oneanother along the span of the blade. This chordwise zone configurationrequires more electrical connections than a spanwise, helicopter-typeconfiguration due to the increased number of smaller heated zones, whichare designed to reduce the size of potential ice chunks that are shedfrom the blades. Electrical connections are notoriously weak points in arotor blade that is subjected to high dynamic motion and bending. Theconcern with electrical connections in this environment is exacerbatedon tiltrotor aircraft because the blades see higher strain levels thanconventional helicopter blades.

FIGS. 2 and 3 illustrate a prior-art de-ice heater blanket 25 used in anIPS on V-22 rotor blades and having a chordwise-zone configuration, asdescribed above. FIG. 2 shows the blanket in a shape like that blanket25 assumes when installed on a leading edge of a blade, whereas FIG. 3is a 2-D representation of the components of blanket 25. Blanket 25comprises seven de-ice zones running along the span of blanket 25, whichare labeled in the FIG. 2 as zone 1, located near the root of the blade,through zone 7, located near the tip of the blade. Each zone comprisesan upper heating element 27 and a lower heating element 29 located onopposite sides of a centerline 31. When blanket 25 is installed on ablade, such as a blade 21 of aircraft 11 of FIG. 1, centerline 31 islocated adjacent leading edge 23, and chordwise widths of components ofblanket 25 are measured above and below centerline 31 in FIG. 3. Inaddition to de-ice zones 1 through 7, a central anti-ice zone 33 extendsfor the entire span of blanket 25 and is generally centered oncenterline 31.

Each heating element 27, 29 is formed as a generally rectangular area,with a wire 35 manually wound in the repeating, sinuous pattern shown indetail in FIG. 4. Wire 35 alternatingly extends toward and away fromcenterline 31 and perpendicular to the span of blanket 25, and elements27, 29 typically have relatively consistent sizes and shapes to maintainsimilar watt densities of elements 27, 29. Elements 27, 29 areelectrically connected to the aircraft power system via one of sourceconductors 37 and a common ground conductor 39. Each source conductor 37is connected to one lower heating element 27, and ground conductor 39 isconnected to each upper heating element 29, thereby allowing forelectricity to flow from the root end of conductors 37 to the associatedelements 27, 29 of a zone and back along ground conductor 39 to the rootend of blanket 25. Soldering is used to form the joints at theconnection points of conductors 37, 39 and elements 27, 29.

During operation in icing conditions, constant electrical power issupplied to anti-ice zone 33 to prevent formation of ice along theleading edge of a blade and to reduce size of ice shed from de-ice zones1 through 7. Time-controlled electrical power is supplied to elements27, 29 in de-ice zones 1 through 7 to shed ice formed behind anti-icezone 33.

The design of blanket 25 has the disadvantage of the need to providepower to zones 2 through 7 located outboard on the blade, which requiresconductors 37, 39 to be routed behind heating elements 27, 29 along thespan of the blade. Thus, conductors 37, 39 are exposed to some of thehighest strains on the blade, which limits the options for material anddesign for the elements that perform this function. With anti-ice zone33 at the leading edge of the blade and dividing heating elements 27, 29to avoid overlapping de-ice and anti-ice elements, crossover wires (notshown) are required to be routed underneath anti-ice zone 33 toelectrically connect heating elements 27, 29. There is at least onecrossover for each chordwise zone, and it is in these areas that thereis an increased risk of shorting anti-ice zone 33 to these de-icecrossover wires. The crossovers also make it difficult to meet thicknessrequirements when forming the blade, which can result in high spots,resistance issues, and shorts within the parent structure. All of thefeatures inherent to the prior-art design result in a product that hasreduced reliability and is difficult to manufacture consistently withhigh quality.

FIGS. 5 through 12 illustrate embodiments of an improved IPS, in which aheater blanket comprises spanwise de-ice and anti-ice zones. The systemshown may be used on aircraft 11 of FIG. 1 or in other applications.FIG. 5 shows an exploded oblique view of a blade assembly, and FIGS. 6and 8 through 12 show 2-D representations of embodiments of the heaterblanket. 1002911 n each of the designs described below, the de-ice andanti-ice zones are electrically connected to the control system throughconnections at the root end of the rotor blade, and no electrical bussesor connections are located along the span of the blade. This permits theuse of several different materials and geometries for bus andconnection, as designs are not limited by the high strains seen alongthe span of the blade. These designs all focus on the leading edge of arotor blade, where ice is known to accumulate in flight, and elementsfrom each of the embodiments could be combined for an ice-protectionsolution. The peripheral shape of the entire heated area of the heaterblanket would be designed to match the ice accretion pattern asdetermined by analysis of a specific rotor blade in order to completelyremove all ice on the leading edge of the blade.

Referring to FIG. 5, a rotor blade 41 is shown in an exploded view.Blade 41 comprises a rigid inner spar 43, which provides the overallshape and structure of assembled blade 41 and a clevis 45 for attachingblade 41 to a rotor hub (not shown). A trailing-edge core 47 isassembled adjacent spar 43, and an upper skin 49 and a lower skin 51 arebonded to spar 43 and trailing-edge core 47 to form the structure ofblade 41. A heater blanket 53 is attached to leading edge 55 of spar 43,and an abrasion strip 57 is installed on blade 41 to protect blanket 53from damage, such as impacts or erosion. In the embodiment shown,blanket 53 is preferably bonded onto spar 43 and able to be debonded forrepair or replacement, though other embodiments may include alternativemethods for attaching blanket 53, as described below.

FIGS. 6 and 8 through 12 illustrate embodiments according to thisdisclosure of anti-ice and/or de-ice zone configurations for heaterblanket 53. As in FIG. 3, chordwise widths of components of theseblanket configurations are measured above and below a centerlineextending spanwise and oriented along the leading edge of the blade wheninstalled. While components of the configurations are shown withspecific shapes, it should be noted that they can incorporate one shapeor a combination of shapes for any section of a zone, including, forexample, wavelike, sawtooth, mazelike, castellated, puzzle-piece edge,and straight.

Referring to FIG. 6, heater blanket configuration 59 comprises anti-icezone 61, lower de-ice zones 63, 65, and upper de-ice zones 67, 69, eachzone 61, 63, 65, 67, 69 comprising a conductive path to form an electricheater. Anti-ice zone 61 is located on the leading edge of the bladealong centerline 71 and is shown as extending between tip 73 and root 75of the blade. As anti-ice zone 61 extends outboard past the blademidspan, edges 77, 79 begin curving away from centerline 71 and towardthe trailing edge of the blade on the upper and lower blade surfaces. Inthe embodiment shown, anti-ice zone 61 takes up the full chordwise widthof the heater blanket as it approaches tip 73. This reflects theimportance of not allowing ice to form at or near tip 73, especiallyduring rotor-borne flight, as ice on the tip substantially degradesperformance of the blade. De-ice zones 63, 65, 67, 69 also extend fromroot 75, but each terminates along the span of the blade prior to tip73. Lower zones 63, 65 and upper zones 67, 69 form interlockingcastellated patterns on each surface of the blade and are defined byedges 81 and 83, respectively, with zones 63, 65, 67, 69 varying in thechordwise dimension along the span of the blade. These interlockingshapes of varying width cause ice to breakup into smaller pieces duringde-icing and shedding than when using prior-art blanket designs.

While shown in a particular configuration, the shape of anti-ice zone 61can vary from that shown by optimizing the shape to match ice accretionpatterns for specific airfoil shapes, blade twist, pitch ranges, andvelocities. Edges 77, 79 of anti-ice zone 61 could be smooth incurvature, as shown, or be wavelike or jagged (e.g., a saw-toothpattern.) Also, a portion of de-ice zones 63, 65, 67, 69 may extendtoward the tip and behind anti-ice zone 61 on the upper and lower bladesurfaces.

The electrical resistance of the conductive path in anti-ice zone 61 andeach de-ice zone 63, 65, 67, 69 is tailored to control alternatingheating within the same spanwise zone to minimize the size of ice beingshed. Alternating heating means that one de-ice zone heats up in severaldifferent areas within the same zone as it extends down the span, andthis zone is one of a few de-ice zones that are cycled on and off toheat the blade near the leading edge at different times along the spanof the blade. The resistance tailoring is controlled by varying thepattern in the parallel, electrical circuit, by adjusting thecross-sectional area of the conductive element either by varyingthickness or width, or by manipulating the amount and dispersion ofconductive particles within a carrier, such as in a conductive coating(e.g., carbon nanotube-infused paint). For example, FIGS. 7A through 7Cillustrate examples of patterns that can be used in anti-ice zone 61 andde-ice zones 63, 65, 67, 69. In FIG. 7A, a conductor 85 is shown in arepeating, sinuous pattern, in which chordwise portions areapproximately the same distance from each other. However, in FIG. 7B, agap 87 is formed in the repeating pattern of conductor 85 to reduce thewatt density of the heater in the location of gap 87, allowing fortailoring of the heating in areas along the blade. FIG. 7C shows anotherembodiment of conductor 85, a section 89 of which has wider spanwiseportions to allow for tailoring of the heating in areas along the blade.Though shown as wider in the spanwise direction, tailoring can also beachieved by, for example, varying the thickness of conductor 85 or byadding additional layers of conductors 85. The ability to vary the wattdensity of components of a heater blanket configuration applies to allembodiments of this disclosure.

In each of the heated zones, redundancy can be incorporated, either bymultiple layers or by multiple connections at the root end of eachanti-ice or de-ice zone. A failure monitoring system can be installed todetect and control a connection failure and switch between inner-zoneconnections while maintaining the nominal result for properzonefunction.

FIG. 8 illustrates heater blanket configuration 91, comprising anti-icezone 93, lower de-ice zones 95, 97, and upper de-ice zones 99, 101, eachzone 93, 95, 97, 99, 101 comprising a conductive path to form anelectric heater. Anti-ice zone 93 is located along centerline 103 forpositioning on the leading edge of the blade and is shown as extendingbetween tip 105 and root 107 of the blade. Like anti-ice zone 61 ofconfiguration 59, as anti-ice zone 93 extends outboard past the blademidspan, edges 109, 111 begin curving away from centerline 103 andtoward the trailing edge of the blade on the upper and lower bladesurfaces. In the embodiment shown, anti-ice zone 93 takes up the fullchordwise width of the heater blanket as it approaches tip 105. De-icezones 95, 97, 99, 101 also extend from root 107, but each terminatesalong the span of the blade prior to tip 105. Lower zones 95, 97 andupper zones 99, 101 form adjacent parallel strips on a correspondingsurface of the blade and are separated at edges 113, 115, respectively,with zones 95, 97, 99, 101 varying in the chordwise dimension as theyterminate at edges 109, 111 at the tip section of anti-ice zone 93. Toallow for tailoring of the heating along zones 93, 95, 97, 99, 101, thewatt density may be varied, such as by varying the path and/or dimensionof conductor(s) therein, as shown and described above in FIGS. 7Athrough 7C. This will provide for breaking up ice accumulated on zones95, 97, 99, 101 into smaller pieces during de-icing and shedding thanwhen using prior-art blanket designs.

FIG. 9 illustrates heater blanket configuration 117, comprising anti-icezone 119 lower de-ice zones 121, 123, 125, and upper de-ice zones 127,129, 131, each zone 119, 121, 123, 125, 127, 129, 131 comprising aconductive path to form an electric heater. Anti-ice zone 119 is locatedalong centerline 133 for positioning on the leading edge of the bladeand is shown as extending between tip 135 and root 137 of the blade.Anti-ice zone 119 has a lower edge 139 and an upper edge 141 that form asinuous, or wave-like, shape, such that zone 119 has varying chordwisewidth about centerline 133 throughout the spanwise length of zone 119.Lower de-ice zones 121, 123, 125 and upper de-ice zones 127, 129, 131have corresponding sinuous shapes and are located adjacent anti-ice zone119 and each other. In the embodiment shown, de-ice zones 121 and 127each have a straight trailing edge and terminate prior to tip 135 due tothe narrowing of the chord width of configuration 117.

Whereas configurations 59, 91, 117 are shown with an anti-ice zone, theconfigurations shown in FIGS. 10 and 11 have several de-ice zones and noanti-ice zones.

FIG. 10 illustrates heater blanket configuration 143, comprising lowerde-ice zones 145, 147, upper de-ice zones 149, 151, and central de-icezones 153, 155. Each zone 145, 147, 149, 151, 153, 155 extends spanwisefrom root 156 to tip 157 and comprises a conductive path to form anelectric heater. Each zone 145, 147, 149, 151, 153, 155 has acastellated shape that forms an interlocking pattern with the adjacentzones 145, 147, 149, 151, 153, 155, like those of configuration 59 ofFIG. 6. However, central zones 153, 155 are positioned along the leadingedge so that portions of zones 153, 155 extend from one side ofcenterline 158 across to the other side of centerline 158, therebyperforming a de-ice function for the leading edge. The interlockingcastellated pattern provides for breaking up ice accumulated on zones145, 147, 149, 151, 153, 155 into smaller pieces during de-icing andshedding than when using prior-art blanket designs.

FIG. 11 illustrates heater blanket configuration 159, comprising lowerde-ice zones 161, 163, upper de-ice zones 165, 167, and central de-icezones 169, 171. Each zone 161, 163, 165, 167, 169, 171 extends spanwisefrom root 173 toward tip 175 and comprises a conductive path to form anelectric heater. Each zone 161, 163, 165, 167, 169, 171 has a sinuousshape that forms an interlocking pattern with the adjacent zones 161,163, 165, 167, 169, 171, like those of configuration 117 of FIG. 9.However, central zones 169, 171 are positioned along the leading edge sothat portions of zones 169, 171 extend from one side of centerline 173across to the other side of centerline 173, thereby performing a de-icefunction for the leading edge. In the embodiment shown, zones 161 and165 each have a straight trailing edge and terminate prior to tip 175due to the narrowing of the chord width of configuration 159. Theinterlocking sinuous patterns provide for breaking up ice accumulated onzones 161, 163, 165, 167, 169, 171 into smaller pieces during de-icingand shedding than when using prior-art blanket designs.

FIG. 12 illustrates another heater blanket configuration 179 that has atailored anti-ice zone 181 and adjacent de-ice zones 183, 185, 187, 189,191, 193. Each zone 181, 183, 185, 187, 189, 191, 193 extends spanwisefrom root 195 to tip 197 and comprises a conductive path to form anelectric heater. Each de-ice zone 183, 185, 187, 189, 191, 193 has acastellated shape that forms a stacked interlocking pattern with theadjacent zones 183, 185, 187, 189, 191, 193, such that portionsextending toward or away from centerline 199 are centered on each otherto form alternating stacked groups 201. Anti-ice zone 181 is positionedalong the leading edge and has bulging portions 203 that extend awayfrom centerline 199 and are centered within each stacked group 201. Thestacked interlocking patterns provide for breaking up ice accumulated onzones 181, 183, 185, 187, 189, 191, 193 into smaller pieces duringde-icing and shedding than when using prior-art blanket designs.

While described herein as being used for tiltrotor aircraft, it shouldbe noted that the IPS and components described above can be used forrotor blades in all appropriate applications, including propellers forfixed-wing aircraft, all manner of rotor-borne aircraft, unmanneddrones, and wind-turbine blades.

At least one embodiment is disclosed, and variations, combinations,and/or modifications of the embodiment(s) and/or features of theembodiment(s) made by a person having ordinary skill in the art arewithin the scope of this disclosure. Alternative embodiments that resultfrom combining, integrating, and/or omitting features of theembodiment(s) are also within the scope of this disclosure. Wherenumerical ranges or limitations are expressly stated, such expressranges or limitations should be understood to include iterative rangesor limitations of like magnitude falling within the expressly statedranges or limitations (e.g., from about 1 to about 10 includes, 2, 3, 4,etc.; greater than 0.10 includes 0.11, 0.12, 0.13, etc.). For example,whenever a numerical range with a lower limit, R_(l), and an upperlimit, R_(u), is disclosed, any number falling within the range isspecifically disclosed. In particular, the following numbers within therange are specifically disclosed: R=R_(l)+k*(R_(u)−R_(l)), wherein k isa variable ranging from 1 percent to 100 percent with a 1 percentincrement, i.e., k is 1 percent, 2 percent, 3 percent, 4 percent, 5percent, . . . 50 percent, 51 percent, 52 percent, . . . , 95 percent,96 percent, 95 percent, 98 percent, 99 percent, or 100 percent.Moreover, any numerical range defined by two R numbers as defined in theabove is also specifically disclosed. Use of the term “optionally” withrespect to any element of a claim means that the element is required, oralternatively, the element is not required, both alternatives beingwithin the scope of the claim. Use of broader terms such as comprises,includes, and having should be understood to provide support fornarrower terms such as consisting of, consisting essentially of, andcomprised substantially of. Accordingly, the scope of protection is notlimited by the description set out above but is defined by the claimsthat follow, that scope including all equivalents of the subject matterof the claims. Each and every claim is incorporated as furtherdisclosure into the specification and the claims are embodiment(s) ofthe present invention. Also, the phrases “at least one of A, B, and C”and “A and/or B and/or C” should each be interpreted to include only A,only B, only C, or any combination of A, B, and C.

What is claimed is:
 1. An ice protection system for a rotor blade, theblade having a leading edge along at least a portion of a spanwiselength extending between a root portion and a tip portion, the systemcomprising: an electric spanwise anti-ice heater configured forplacement on the leading edge of the blade; a first electric spanwisede-ice heater adjacent the anti-ice heater and having varying chordwisedimensions, the de-ice heater being configured for placement on an uppersurface of the blade or a lower surface of the blade; and electricalconnectors for each heater, the connectors being configured forconnection near the root portion of the blade to a source of electricalpower.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the anti-ice heater has a firstportion having a first chordwise width and a second portion having alarger second chordwise width, the second portion being configured to belocated toward the tip portion of the blade.
 3. The system of claim 1,further comprising: a second electric spanwise de-ice heater havingvarying chordwise dimensions and configured for placement on an uppersurface of the blade or a lower surface of the blade; wherein the secondde-ice heater is adjacent the first de-ice heater.
 4. The system ofclaim 3, wherein adjacent edges of the de-ice heaters form aninterlocking pattern.
 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the interlockingpattern is sinuous.
 6. The system of claim 4, wherein the interlockingpattern is castellated.
 7. The system of claim 1, wherein a watt densityof at least one of the heaters varies along its spanwise length.
 8. Thesystem of claim 1, wherein during operation the anti-ice heater receivesconstant electrical power and the de-ice heater receives cyclicelectrical power.
 9. An ice protection system for a rotor blade, theblade having a leading edge along at least a portion of a spanwiselength extending between a root portion and a tip portion, the systemcomprising: a plurality of electric spanwise de-ice heaters, the heatersbeing configured for extending from the root portion of the blade to thetip portion of the blade, the heaters also being configured forplacement on an upper surface of the blade or a lower surface of theblade, at least a portion of at least one of the heaters beingconfigured to extend onto the leading edge of the blade; and electricalconnectors for each heater, the connectors being configured forconnection near the root portion of the blade to a source of electricalpower.
 10. The system of claim 9, wherein adjacent edges of the heatersform an interlocking pattern.
 11. The system of claim 10, wherein theinterlocking pattern is sinuous.
 12. The system of claim 10, wherein theinterlocking pattern is sinuous, such that portions of the pattern areconfigured to extend onto the leading edge of the blade.
 13. The systemof claim 10, wherein the interlocking pattern is castellated.
 14. Thesystem of claim 10, wherein the interlocking pattern is castellated,such that portions of the pattern are configured to extend onto theleading edge of the blade.
 15. The system of claim 9, wherein a wattdensity of at least one of the heaters varies along its spanwise length.16. The system of claim 9, wherein during operation the anti-ice heaterreceives constant electrical power and the de-ice heater receives cyclicelectrical power.
 17. An aircraft, comprising: at least one rotor, eachrotor having a plurality of blades, each blade having a leading edgealong at least a portion of a spanwise length extending between a rootportion and a tip portion; and a heater blanket for each blade,comprising: an electric spanwise anti-ice heater configured forplacement on the leading edge of the blade; a first electric spanwisede-ice heater adjacent the anti-ice heater and having varying chordwisedimensions, the de-ice heater being configured for placement on an uppersurface of the blade or a lower surface of the blade; a second electricspanwise de-ice heater adjacent the first de-ice heater and havingvarying chordwise dimensions, the de-ice heater being configured forplacement on the same surface of the blade as the first de-ice heater;and electrical connectors for each heater, the connectors beingconfigured for connection near the root portion of the blade to a sourceof electrical power.
 18. The aircraft of claim 17, wherein adjacentedges of the de-ice heaters form an interlocking pattern.
 19. The systemof claim 18, wherein the interlocking pattern is sinuous.
 20. The systemof claim 18, wherein the interlocking pattern is castellated.